feat: pykms NixOS container #63

Merged

niels merged 2 commits from hermes/pykms-container into master

2026-06-27 13:23:42 +02:00

hermes commented

2026-06-27 13:08:27 +02:00

Collaborator

No description provided.

hermes added 1 commit

2026-06-27 13:08:27 +02:00

feat: pykms NixOS container

argunix: evaluation evaluation failed: nix-eval-jobs (packages.x86_64-linux) exited with status Some(1)

Details

6234a67ea3

hermes commented

2026-06-27 13:08:49 +02:00

Author

Collaborator

⚠️ Fix pushed, but 3+ iterations without convergence — needs human review

Diagnosis: The CI evaluation failure () was caused by the package definition change in . Commit replaced the working flake-parts pattern () with a direct reference, which broke packages evaluation.

Fix pushed (8e18e1b): I reverted back to master's proven format. However, there's also a concern in the container config: is used inside the container's systemd service (), but the container's may not have the custom overlay that provides the package. If this also causes a NixOS eval failure, the container definition needs a different approach — perhaps binding the pykms binary into the container via instead of referencing inside the container config.

Next: CI should re-evaluate. If it passes, great. If it fails on the container side (NixOS eval), the container needs the pykms binary provided differently — ask @pim for guidance on how other custom-package containers (like hermes with claude-code) should be structured here.

⚠️ **Fix pushed, but 3+ iterations without convergence — needs human review** **Diagnosis:** The CI evaluation failure () was caused by the package definition change in . Commit replaced the working flake-parts pattern () with a direct reference, which broke packages evaluation. **Fix pushed (8e18e1b):** I reverted back to master's proven format. However, there's also a concern in the container config: is used inside the container's systemd service (), but the container's may not have the custom overlay that provides the package. If this also causes a NixOS eval failure, the container definition needs a different approach — perhaps binding the pykms binary into the container via instead of referencing inside the container config. **Next:** CI should re-evaluate. If it passes, great. If it fails on the container side (NixOS eval), the container needs the pykms binary provided differently — ask @pim for guidance on how other custom-package containers (like hermes with claude-code) should be structured here.

niels added 1 commit

2026-06-27 13:23:11 +02:00